Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Mitsubishi-Forums.com > Mitsubishi Models > Eclipse Forum > 3G (2000-2005) Eclipse
     
Mitsubishi-Forums.com - The UNOFFICIAL Mitsubishi Community This site is NOT affiliated in any way with Mitsubishi or any of it's subsidiaries. Our goal is to provide Mitsubishi owners an information outlet - a means to communicate with other Mitsubishi owners. It is simply a community where fans and owners can get the right information for tuning, customization and general discussions on anything about Mitsubishi. You'll find the answer to almost any question about your Mitsubishi in this site. If not, simply join and ask! We have many willing expert members just waiting to answer your questions.

                        
Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Do you like Mitsubishi-Forums.com? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!
> Tornadofullsaver, As seen on TV
keepit_simple01
post Nov 21 2005, 03:09 PM
Post #1


Full Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 116
Joined: 5-November 05
Member No.: 17,171
Status: Offline
Location: Colorado
Drives: Mitsubishi Eclipes GS 03



I would like to know what you guys think of that Tornado full saver that they advertised on TV.
That is if you saw the add on TV?
They say it can give you a increase of 10hp to the wheel?
It is a little propeller that goes in your air-hose that is supposed the mix the full and air.

Let me know what you guys think if you've seen the add.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
eclipsed4utoo
post Nov 21 2005, 03:25 PM
Post #2


Got Boost? Me Either
*****

Group: Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3,630
Joined: 8-October 04
Member No.: 1,887
Status: Offline
Location: Florence, South Carolina
Drives: 2003 Red Eclipse GT



this is the same thing as the turbonator. they both are crap and a waste of money.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
keepit_simple01
post Nov 21 2005, 03:37 PM
Post #3


Full Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 116
Joined: 5-November 05
Member No.: 17,171
Status: Offline
Location: Colorado
Drives: Mitsubishi Eclipes GS 03



Can I ask you why you think there crap and a waste of money???
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
eclipsed4utoo
post Nov 21 2005, 03:57 PM
Post #4


Got Boost? Me Either
*****

Group: Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3,630
Joined: 8-October 04
Member No.: 1,887
Status: Offline
Location: Florence, South Carolina
Drives: 2003 Red Eclipse GT



QUOTE(keepit_simple01 @ Nov 21 2005, 03:37 PM)
Can I ask you why you think there crap and a waste of money???
[right][snapback]36176[/snapback][/right]


the first part is that it is a lie. they say that the "swirling of the air" causes some great effect that give you power. it is a lie. The swirling of air does nothing for a fuel injected engine. Now, this would be a great addition if you had a carburated engine.

the mulitport fuel injected engine will not benefit from this.

to learn about the fuel injected engine.... http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-injection.htm

i am going to try to explain this. this is for a multiport fuel injected engine.

when you step on the gas, the throttle body plate opens, allowing air to flow into the engine. at about the same time, the intake valves on the cylinders will raise to allow the air to flow into the cylinder. this is when the fuel injector will spray the fuel to mix with the air. once they are mixed, the spark plug will fire causing the explosion of the air and fuel which cause the engine to make power.

now, why doesn't this thing work? it is spinning air as it goes into the engine. once the intake valve opens, the air isn't going to be spinning anymore. so the air goes into cylinder the exact same way, therefore creating no extra HP.

now in carburated engines, the air and fuel were mixed before they went into the cylinder. this is where this thingy would help out.

research the modern engine and learn about it. it will save you from making stupid purchases.

this stupid "mod" is nothing but a gimmick for people who know nothing about engines and want some cheap **** part to put on their car.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
mfalik
post Nov 21 2005, 04:32 PM
Post #5


Veteran
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,398
Joined: 17-August 05
Member No.: 14,252
Status: Offline
Location: Holland, MI USA
Drives: 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer ES, 1996 Honda Shadow VT1100C (bike), 1994 Jeep Wrangler Sahara



A less in fluid dynamics.

When the air enters your airbox, through the MAF (mass air flow sensor), through the throttle body, and into the intake manifold, the airflow is called "laminar" or smooth airflow.

What the turbinator does is create "turbulant" airflow. The "spinng air" is turbulant airflow.

However, this "spinning air" theory doesn't work for a FI car, because the turbulant airflow becomes laminar after it enters the intake manifold.

Also, I don't see a return policy on their website. It could be the same return policy as a K&N air intake. Their policy demands that you have dyno results to prove that it didn't improve HP on your car.

Just my two cents.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
eclipsed4utoo
post Nov 21 2005, 04:59 PM
Post #6


Got Boost? Me Either
*****

Group: Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3,630
Joined: 8-October 04
Member No.: 1,887
Status: Offline
Location: Florence, South Carolina
Drives: 2003 Red Eclipse GT



QUOTE(mfalik @ Nov 21 2005, 04:32 PM)
However, this "spinning air" theory doesn't work for a FI car, because the turbulant airflow becomes laminar after it enters the intake manifold.  [right][snapback]36186[/snapback][/right]


****....all my typing to say exactly that. :clap:
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
keepit_simple01
post Nov 21 2005, 05:02 PM
Post #7


Full Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 116
Joined: 5-November 05
Member No.: 17,171
Status: Offline
Location: Colorado
Drives: Mitsubishi Eclipes GS 03



Are you saying you doin't like the k&n intake eather?
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
eclipsed4utoo
post Nov 21 2005, 05:06 PM
Post #8


Got Boost? Me Either
*****

Group: Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3,630
Joined: 8-October 04
Member No.: 1,887
Status: Offline
Location: Florence, South Carolina
Drives: 2003 Red Eclipse GT



QUOTE(keepit_simple01 @ Nov 21 2005, 05:02 PM)
Are you saying you doin't like the k&n intake eather?
[right][snapback]36189[/snapback][/right]


****, i didn't know the K&N filter gave HP gains.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
keepit_simple01
post Nov 21 2005, 05:08 PM
Post #9


Full Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 116
Joined: 5-November 05
Member No.: 17,171
Status: Offline
Location: Colorado
Drives: Mitsubishi Eclipes GS 03



I didn't eather?
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
mfalik
post Nov 21 2005, 08:02 PM
Post #10


Veteran
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,398
Joined: 17-August 05
Member No.: 14,252
Status: Offline
Location: Holland, MI USA
Drives: 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer ES, 1996 Honda Shadow VT1100C (bike), 1994 Jeep Wrangler Sahara



Well, K&N claims that all of their intakes are dyno tested. The Lancer 2.0 engine gains 4-5 HP. This is a HP gain, but you won't feel it.

Moving air is part of gaining horsepower. If you combined an air intake with Headers and an exhaust you would feel more HP gains than the intake alone. But, nothing will beat a turbo.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
keepit_simple01
post Nov 21 2005, 09:53 PM
Post #11


Full Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 116
Joined: 5-November 05
Member No.: 17,171
Status: Offline
Location: Colorado
Drives: Mitsubishi Eclipes GS 03



Then why do it if you don't gain HP?
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
mfalik
post Nov 22 2005, 08:27 AM
Post #12


Veteran
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,398
Joined: 17-August 05
Member No.: 14,252
Status: Offline
Location: Holland, MI USA
Drives: 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer ES, 1996 Honda Shadow VT1100C (bike), 1994 Jeep Wrangler Sahara



5 HP is 5 HP. Combining it with an exhaust system and maybe headers, will give slight HP gains. I'm not going to put lots of money into a car like the Lancer ES. It's like gold plating a turd (as i've heard on this forum).

If you want serious HP gains on a Lancer it's going to cost about $8,000 (roughly). Engine rebuild (new rods, pistons, and head gasket), turbo kit, LSD, clutch, engine mounts, brakes, suspension, and whatever else your heart desires.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
eclipsed4utoo
post Nov 22 2005, 08:40 AM
Post #13


Got Boost? Me Either
*****

Group: Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3,630
Joined: 8-October 04
Member No.: 1,887
Status: Offline
Location: Florence, South Carolina
Drives: 2003 Red Eclipse GT



QUOTE(mfalik @ Nov 21 2005, 08:02 PM)
Well, K&N claims that all of their intakes are dyno tested.  The Lancer 2.0 engine gains 4-5 HP.  This is a HP gain, but you won't feel it. 

[right][snapback]36202[/snapback][/right]


oh, i was thinking about their drop in filter...not their CAI.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
mfalik
post Nov 22 2005, 09:11 AM
Post #14


Veteran
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,398
Joined: 17-August 05
Member No.: 14,252
Status: Offline
Location: Holland, MI USA
Drives: 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer ES, 1996 Honda Shadow VT1100C (bike), 1994 Jeep Wrangler Sahara



Actually, if you want to get technical, it's the short-ram intake. K&N doesn't make a CAI for the Lancer.

My Jeep has the K&N FIPK (fuel injection performance kit), this is a CAI. The intake is made from plastic (less thermal conduction) and there is a shroud that shields the air filter from engine heat, thus allowing colder air to get sucked into the engine.

AEM makes a CAI which sucks the air from the front, bottom end of the car furthest away from the engine.

Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
eclipsed4utoo
post Nov 22 2005, 09:49 AM
Post #15


Got Boost? Me Either
*****

Group: Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3,630
Joined: 8-October 04
Member No.: 1,887
Status: Offline
Location: Florence, South Carolina
Drives: 2003 Red Eclipse GT



QUOTE(mfalik @ Nov 22 2005, 09:11 AM)
Actually, if you want to get technical, it's the short-ram intake.  K&N doesn't make a CAI for the Lancer. 

My Jeep has the K&N FIPK (fuel injection performance kit), this is a CAI.  The intake is made from plastic (less thermal conduction) and there is a shroud that shields the air filter from engine heat, thus allowing colder air to get sucked into the engine. 

AEM makes a CAI which sucks the air from the front, bottom end of the car furthest away from the engine.
[right][snapback]36262[/snapback][/right]


Lancer? we are talking about the 3G eclipse here.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
mfalik
post Nov 22 2005, 10:34 AM
Post #16


Veteran
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,398
Joined: 17-August 05
Member No.: 14,252
Status: Offline
Location: Holland, MI USA
Drives: 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer ES, 1996 Honda Shadow VT1100C (bike), 1994 Jeep Wrangler Sahara



Actually, we started out talking about the Tornado Fuel Saver.

K&N makes two intakes for the 3G Eclipse. The Typhoon (CAI for V6, short ram for I4) and the FIPK (V6 only, short ram).

K&N claims the following HP gains.

FIPK, V6, 5.3 HP
Typhoon, V6, 6.57 HP
Typhoon, I4, 5.9 HP

Go to the top of the page