Which Do You Like Better -

Do you like Mitsubishi-Forums.com? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!

Which Do You Like Better, Evo VIII or the 2004 Subaru WRX STi?

Which do you think is better

The 2004 Mitsubishi Evolution VIII	[ 41 ]	[74.55%]
The 2004 Subaru WRX STi	[ 14 ]	[25.45%]
Total Votes: 55
Guests cannot vote

Burninrubber	Aug 1 2005, 02:24 PM Post #21
Full Member Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 19-June 05 Member No.: 11,053 Location: clackamas, Oregon, USA Drives: 2001 eclipse GT Status: OFFLINE	QUOTE([]D [] []v[] []D @ Dec 21 2004, 05:58 AM) nah im talking about the 2004 models EVO VIII. i would love to have an evo but the 2004 wrx sti will smoke a evo they go 0-60 in 4.6 whereas the evo does it in 5 seconds. They sti has more horsepower and troque. actually its 5.6 secons, not even a corvettte zo6 ca do 4.6 (4.9) and it has a fiberglass body with 500 hp and 475 lb tq

Endeavorxlsawd05	Sep 29 2005, 07:54 PM Post #22
Full Member Group: Members Posts: 94 Joined: 8-June 05 Member No.: 10,566 Location: York,PA Drives: 06 Outlander SE Status: OFFLINE	Trust me I have drove both and I Owned a Evo for about a year and a few months. The evo is faster and handles a hundred times better than the sti or any type wrx. If you would pick a wrx over a evo your smoking something unless you want more luxury like. But if you want the real performance and handling you better be buying a evo. Subaru is a joke.

EMC 3000gt	Nov 13 2006, 11:05 PM Post #23
Cougar Hunter Group: Super Mod Posts: 5,313 Joined: 18-October 06 Member No.: 30,873 Location: Tri-State Area Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2007 Scion TC Status: OFFLINE	Both cars are amazing but i have to go with the STI Bigger motor and less boost from the factory mean less stress on the motor! But then again I wouldn't turn either down if somebody was like heres the keys its yours :auto: Oh by the way the Acura TL yes the TL not the RL the TL FWD Smokes the EVO Was in the evo watched it happen 3 times! would do the same to the sti so uhh yeah.

97eclipsegstspyder3	Nov 14 2006, 10:32 AM Post #24
Full Member Group: Members Posts: 138 Joined: 25-September 06 Member No.: 29,948 Location: USA Drives: 1997 eclipse gst spyder Status: OFFLINE	i would go with the wrx sti. i like the look of the sti better then the evo. also the sti has a bigger motor which means more power. so i am going to go with the wrx sti :gunsmilie:

unspokengift	Nov 14 2006, 04:37 PM Post #25
Full Member Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 18-October 06 Member No.: 30,858 Location: Colorado Drives: 90` AWD Talon TSI Status: OFFLINE	Evo all the way... The stock pistons in the subi motors are crap and if you get any detonation say bye bye motor and hello rebuild. Known fact from lots of subi owners. Also the axels on the subis are weak, and thats why you really dont hear about many of them running in the 11's on fully stock axels. They usually break off the launches, but in the evo's, that motor and axels are made much more stronger. You hear about more evo's with simple mods running 10's and 11's all day over the STI's.

TTAngel	Nov 15 2006, 09:16 AM Post #26
Wing Nut Group: Members Posts: 935 Joined: 16-June 05 Member No.: 10,897 Location: Green Bay, WI Drives: 1995 Dodge Stealth RT/TT Status: OFFLINE	Ive heard horror stories replacing clutches and what not in either one... I'd prolly take an evo, just because... If I was looking.

downshift	Nov 15 2006, 09:28 AM Post #27
Full Member Group: Members Posts: 174 Joined: 2-June 06 Member No.: 24,868 Location: Michigan, KALAMAZOO Drives: 2006 LANCER Status: OFFLINE	i saw a bone stock evo get better times at an autocross meet then mod'd sti's. it was the evo drivers first time too. (i'd be more then happy to leave sti keys sitting on a table and jumping into an Evolution) :grin:

unspokengift	Nov 15 2006, 01:51 PM Post #28
Full Member Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 18-October 06 Member No.: 30,858 Location: Colorado Drives: 90` AWD Talon TSI Status: OFFLINE	QUOTE(TTAngel @ Nov 15 2006, 09:16 AM) Ive heard horror stories replacing clutches and what not in either one... I'd prolly take an evo, just because... If I was looking. Yea I've watched friends change out clutches and flywheels on both. It was a boring pain to watch but sucked for them also. The manufacturers are trying to be smart and sneaky with these new cars. Making you take them to the dealerships to get worked on so you can payout.

EMC 3000gt	Nov 19 2006, 03:56 PM Post #29
Cougar Hunter Group: Super Mod Posts: 5,313 Joined: 18-October 06 Member No.: 30,873 Location: Tri-State Area Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2007 Scion TC Status: OFFLINE	Oh the horror stories are oh so true in both but I have heard more about the evo, granted I have more friends with evos than sti's

ochi	Apr 28 2008, 06:51 AM Post #30
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 18 Joined: 27-August 07 Member No.: 44,193 Location: Antipolo City of Rizal, Philippines Drives: 1971 Toyota Corolla Sprinter (4A-GE / 7A-FE Hybrid), 1983 Mitsubishi Lancer GSR (4G32), 1985 Mitsubishi Lancer SL (4G33), 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer GLi (4G15A), 2007 Toyota Innova G (1TR-FE) Status: OFFLINE	would definitely go for the EVO! better handling is the way to go! stinking subby with that wretched noisy boxer engine...

EMC 3000gt	Apr 28 2008, 10:32 AM Post #31
Cougar Hunter Group: Super Mod Posts: 5,313 Joined: 18-October 06 Member No.: 30,873 Location: Tri-State Area Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2007 Scion TC Status: OFFLINE	I happen to Love the Boxer sound.

Jim125	Jun 2 2008, 07:07 AM Post #32
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 31-May 08 Member No.: 58,682 Location: China Drives: 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T Status: OFFLINE	Hi all, I prefer this one:The 2004 Subaru WRX STi

Advanced Search

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

Get your Mitsubishi listed in the Garage Today, for FREE, to share with the world what you drive and what toys and modifications you have.

Time is now: 5th July 2008 - 05:59 PM

Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.