Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.
Do you like Mitsubishi-Forums.com? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!
Dealer Sucks......... |
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 03:07 PM
|

Full Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 114
Joined: 20-November 07
Member No.: 48,284
Status: 
Location: Toronto
Drives: Lancer 2008 GTS

|
QUOTE(Lancer21 @ Jan 11 2008, 01:51 PM) man i'd just call my dealer a min ago " not saying who i am "and ask them if i can put any aftermarket parts on it and does it void my warranty and guess wat they say YES until ur warranty ends like shite im gonna wait for that to come [right][snapback]133788[/snapback][/right]
tell them to put it in writing, 10 bucks says they wont, then take them to court, claiming some wonderful damages or mental trauma or something
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 03:09 PM
|

Full Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 114
Joined: 20-November 07
Member No.: 48,284
Status: 
Location: Toronto
Drives: Lancer 2008 GTS

|
QUOTE(Eagles GTS 08 @ Jan 11 2008, 02:46 PM) Does anyone know if mitsu dealerships are linked somehow. If one documents a mod and want to be a pain, can you take your car to another dealer without the new dealer knowing anything that went on at the old PITA dealer. [right][snapback]133802[/snapback][/right]
Mitsu dealers are linked to Mitsu HQ thru obligations, if a request came down by Mitsu HQ then yes it can be shared, but i am not aware of some computer linked system. I could be wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 05:09 PM
|

RAWR

Group: Super Mod
Posts: 746
Joined: 16-September 07
Member No.: 45,225
Status: 
Location: Edmonton, AB - Canada
Drives: 2008 Lancer GTS m/t

|
QUOTE(Eagles GTS 08 @ Jan 11 2008, 12:46 PM) Does anyone know if mitsu dealerships are linked somehow. If one documents a mod and want to be a pain, can you take your car to another dealer without the new dealer knowing anything that went on at the old PITA dealer. [right][snapback]133802[/snapback][/right]
They are not directly linked unless they are owned by the same CEO or whatnot. That is at least true for dealers in my city. I know this because I have a free oil change for life credit at the dealer I bought my car with, but asked another dealer in the city who is owned by a different company and they said that my free oil changes only apply for that other dealership because in theory they're a completely separate branch. On that note, who knows how it works with mods. And if you can remove a mod in case something happens b4 u go to the other dealer. I mean they will be able to tell if the car is stock or not if you still have the mod in it etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 06:48 PM
|

RAWR

Group: Super Mod
Posts: 746
Joined: 16-September 07
Member No.: 45,225
Status: 
Location: Edmonton, AB - Canada
Drives: 2008 Lancer GTS m/t

|
QUOTE(Lancer21 @ Jan 11 2008, 03:44 PM) and yes i said intake, muffler etc... and they still say it'll void my warranty so f**k mitsu. [right][snapback]133851[/snapback][/right]
I don't know what's wrong with your dealer, because mine said that it wont. Even if i was to put a turbo in it, still won't void the warranty. Not automatically. Like explained many times (and in different threads) it would and/or should only void your warranty if there is a defect caused directly by the modification itself. Then in that case that specific defect would not apply under manufacture warranty. Just because you put a CAI in or something shouldn't automatically void your 10 year warranty on drive train. That would be like getting a tint on the windows and your warranty being voided on the whole body of the car... very unreasonable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 12:00 PM
|

Senior
  
Group: Members
Posts: 391
Joined: 4-October 06
Member No.: 30,312
Status: 
Location: Canada
Drives: 08 Lancer GTS Manual

|
1.The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2302©)
This federal law regulates warranties for the protection of consumers. The essence of the law concerning aftermarket auto parts is that a vehicle manufacturer may not condition a written or implied warranty on the consumers using parts or services which are identified by brand, trade, or corporate name (such as the vehicle maker's brand) unless the parts or service are provided free of charge. The law means that the use of an aftermarket part alone is not cause for denying the warranty. However, the law's protection does not extend to aftermarket parts in situations where such parts actually caused the damage being claimed under the warranty. Further, consumers are advised to be aware of any specific terms or conditions stated in the warranty which may result in its being voided. The law states in relevant part:
No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumers using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade or corporate name... (15 U.S.C. 2302©).
...Under this federal statute, a manufacturer who issues a warranty on your motor vehicle is prohibited from requiring you to use a service or maintenance item, unless such item is provided, free of charge, under your warranty or unless the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) waives this prohibition against the manufacturer....
Further, under the act, aftermarket equipment that improves performance does not automatically void a vehicle manufacturer's original warranty, unless the warranty clearly states the addition of aftermarket equipment automatically voids your vehicle's warranty, or if it can be proven that the aftermarket device is the direct cause of the failure....
Under the Magnuson-Moss Act, a dealer must prove, not just vocalize, that aftermarket equipment caused the need for repairs before it can deny warranty coverage. If the dealer cannot prove such a claim — or it proffers a questionable explanation — it is your legal right to demand compliance with the warranty. The Federal Trade Commission administers the Magnuson-Moss Act and monitors compliance with warranty law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 10:38 AM
| |