Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Mitsubishi-Forums.com > Mitsubishi Models > Eclipse Forum > 1G/2G (1990-1999) Eclipse
     
Mitsubishi-Forums.com - The UNOFFICIAL Mitsubishi Community This site is NOT affiliated in any way with Mitsubishi or any of it's subsidiaries. Our goal is to provide Mitsubishi owners an information outlet - a means to communicate with other Mitsubishi owners. It is simply a community where fans and owners can get the right information for tuning, customization and general discussions on anything about Mitsubishi. You'll find the answer to almost any question about your Mitsubishi in this site. If not, simply join and ask! We have many willing expert members just waiting to answer your questions.

                        
Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Do you like Mitsubishi-Forums.com? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!
> Pistons/rods, what compression?
toxicityfreak01
post Jan 17 2008, 10:19 PM
Post #1


Senior
***

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 46,421
Status: Offline
Location: USA
Drives: 1993 eclipse gs non-turbo 4g63 motor 5spd.



okay im looking at either a high compression piston, or a low compression piston for my 4g63 non turbo motor 93. and i was wondering what would benefit the non turbo setup, and what would see more of a power gain? because this is probably going to be my biggest power gain is a new piston/rod combo from eagle so i want to have a well rounded level of power from low rpms to mid to high and well im not sure what path to go....

i either want a 9:1 compression ratio, or an 8:3:1 compression ratio.



Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
militaryman108
post Jan 17 2008, 10:33 PM
Post #2


THE resident auto-x man and college student.
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 1,495
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 44,646
Status: Offline
Location: United States, Cincinnati Oh
Drives: 1993 Talon tsi awd, 1995 talon tsi awd



IF you go lower compression you're already setting yourself up for F/I. The fact that you're running a 4g63 non turbo practically screams at you not to go F/I tho. I would go with the 9:1, maybe even higher.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
toxicityfreak01
post Jan 17 2008, 10:41 PM
Post #3


Senior
***

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 46,421
Status: Offline
Location: USA
Drives: 1993 eclipse gs non-turbo 4g63 motor 5spd.



okay cause i was talking to my mechanic about the pros and cons on n/a vs turbo and a set of pistons would benefit a non turbo motor simply because of the ratio im assuming, and because there 1mm oversize stock and forged thats gona help out a lot. im not to aquatinted with pistons and compression ratios quite yet but im learning....


i wana to have a setup where the power is going from low rpm all thw way to high rpms without boost.....so i dont know if that sounds vague or confusing, but i was just asking what kind of pistons would cause that to happen



Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
EMC 3000gt
post Jan 17 2008, 11:48 PM
Post #4


Resident Honda Owner
Group Icon

Group: Super Mod
Posts: 7,032
Joined: 18-October 06
Member No.: 30,873
Status: Offline
Location: Tri-State Area
Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2004 Acura RSX Type - S



You need to go with high compression if your not going turbo.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
4G63Attack
post Jan 18 2008, 05:34 AM
Post #5


The Green Hell
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,076
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 7,500
Status: Offline
Location: SoCal
Drives: 1G GSX



with a 9 or a 8 compression that is still low. you need something like a 10 compression. higher rev would be good too.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
toxicityfreak01
post Jan 18 2008, 09:40 AM
Post #6


Senior
***

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 46,421
Status: Offline
Location: USA
Drives: 1993 eclipse gs non-turbo 4g63 motor 5spd.



they make a 10:1 compression piston? :)

i'll try to look into that, cause the only ratio i found with the highest compressiopn was 9:1
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
militaryman108
post Jan 18 2008, 10:37 AM
Post #7


THE resident auto-x man and college student.
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 1,495
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 44,646
Status: Offline
Location: United States, Cincinnati Oh
Drives: 1993 Talon tsi awd, 1995 talon tsi awd



QUOTE(toxicityfreak01 @ Jan 18 2008, 09:40 AM)
they make a 10:1 compression piston?  :)

i'll try to look into that, cause the only ratio i found with the highest compressiopn was 9:1
[right][snapback]135402[/snapback][/right]


It will probably be hard to find high compression pistons for your car because your engine was meant to be stock turbo lol
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
4G63Attack
post Jan 18 2008, 03:46 PM
Post #8


The Green Hell
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,076
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 7,500
Status: Offline
Location: SoCal
Drives: 1G GSX



you can get custom piston made
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
EMC 3000gt
post Jan 19 2008, 01:43 PM
Post #9


Resident Honda Owner
Group Icon

Group: Super Mod
Posts: 7,032
Joined: 18-October 06
Member No.: 30,873
Status: Offline
Location: Tri-State Area
Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2004 Acura RSX Type - S



The 3000GT non turbos are 10:1. I would suggest nothing lower then that.

P.S. I really hate this idea of an all motor eclipse, it sounds like you have to much honda left in you. The reason I say this is because Honda Motors have been known to kick **** while being NA because their cars weigh in at under 2000LBS

Your car?
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
toxicityfreak01
post Jan 21 2008, 08:40 PM
Post #10


Senior
***

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 46,421
Status: Offline
Location: USA
Drives: 1993 eclipse gs non-turbo 4g63 motor 5spd.



well dude your right. i am a honda freak, cause its what im surounded by with all my friends driving hondas and them all racing everyone and beating the piss outa everyone with their little dohc vtec motors almost bone stock.

but i really like the idea of a naturally aspirated car cause its more reliable and there's not a whole lot you can do to mess **** up unless you drive it into the ground, but everyone does that now-a-days.

but i want to build a n/a eclipse cause no ones done it and i want to prove people wrong when they say your wasting your time and money....
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
EMC 3000gt
post Jan 21 2008, 10:43 PM
Post #11


Resident Honda Owner
Group Icon

Group: Super Mod
Posts: 7,032
Joined: 18-October 06
Member No.: 30,873
Status: Offline
Location: Tri-State Area
Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2004 Acura RSX Type - S



Well you are...
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
toxicityfreak01
post Jan 22 2008, 10:12 PM
Post #12


Senior
***

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 46,421
Status: Offline
Location: USA
Drives: 1993 eclipse gs non-turbo 4g63 motor 5spd.



what wasting money or the honda freak? but think about it dude. if i take the advantage and fully build my motor with everything from the ground up so its boost ready if i wanted to throw together a turbo setup it wont be beneficial cause i built my motor. and i heard time and time again the stock internals, blocks/heads can handle anything you throw at it, and this case its lots of boost....so i think im on the safer side with the build. but i just love how a n/a motor sounds once it hits its peak and just takes off......
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
EMC 3000gt
post Jan 22 2008, 11:47 PM
Post #13


Resident Honda Owner
Group Icon

Group: Super Mod
Posts: 7,032
Joined: 18-October 06
Member No.: 30,873
Status: Offline
Location: Tri-State Area
Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2004 Acura RSX Type - S



No because when you dig into your motor you have to decide what compression you are going to run.

High compression and boost isn't an option.

Low compression and your soft on power with out a turbo
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
toxicityfreak01
post Jan 23 2008, 09:53 PM
Post #14


Senior
***

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 46,421
Status: Offline
Location: USA
Drives: 1993 eclipse gs non-turbo 4g63 motor 5spd.



i just want to have a 220hp n/a fully built motor

with the basic boltons and a fully built internal setup/head
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
EMC 3000gt
post Jan 24 2008, 02:37 AM
Post #15


Resident Honda Owner
Group Icon

Group: Super Mod
Posts: 7,032
Joined: 18-October 06
Member No.: 30,873
Status: Offline
Location: Tri-State Area
Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2004 Acura RSX Type - S



Price it out. Its not cost effective at all. And I don't see you making that power.
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
toxicityfreak01
post Jan 24 2008, 10:23 PM
Post #16


Senior
***

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 46,421
Status: Offline
Location: USA
Drives: 1993 eclipse gs non-turbo 4g63 motor 5spd.



well i know for starters i either wana rebuild my 50k 4g63 non turbo motor, or get the same motor with like 30k on the motor and rip it all apart and replace everything.

but the really big upgrade im getting as far as performance goes is the crank, and pistons/rods and eagle makes the whole rotating assembly (pistons rods and crank) for around 1300 on slowbowracing.com i think. im not positive on the price but after that im going with a buschurracing stage 1 head with valves springs and retainers from them included in the head for around 670. the clutch im up in the air about cause im torn between a few. unorthodox ss pullys are like 350 and cam gears then im done


i just dont want to boost my car. if that makes it any easier to understand why i want to go n/a
Go to the top of the page
 
QuoteReply
EMC 3000gt