Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · Resend Validation Email
Mitsubishi-Forums.com > Mitsubishi Models > Eclipse Forum > 1G/2G (1990-1999) Eclipse > Cold Air Intake Or Short Ram Intake?
     
                        
Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.
 
Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Feature my ride Newest rides Updated rides Most modified

Do you like Mitsubishi-Forums.com? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!
 Cold Air Intake Or Short Ram Intake?
 
lillben07
post Jun 5 2008, 05:15 PM
Post #1


Member
*


Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 2-March 08
Member No.: 53,598
Location: USA
Drives: 1991 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Status: OFFLINE



Which would be better for getting the biggest power boost on a 91 Eclispe GS with the 4G63 (2.0L)? Don't you need a hood scoop for the short ram intake so that you force more air in? I wan't to replace my stock intake with whichever will give me the biggest power boost. Thanks! :liebe011:
Top
User is offlinePMProfile CardEmail Poster
QuoteReply
ProjectGrip
post Jun 6 2008, 06:54 PM
Post #2


Full Member
**


Group: Members
Posts: 135
Joined: 27-November 07
Member No.: 48,578
Location: San Diego
Drives: 98 Eclipse RS
Status: OFFLINE



Yes. Short Ram is meant for Ram Air: meaning air is being directly forced into ur intake that is the best set up. BUT! yes you have to have a scoop in your hood that actually gonna feed the Ram in take. That would be the best performance set up, if you did that with a stock hood u wont get any where.

If u like the stock hood go for the cold air...
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
NoirRacer
post Jun 6 2008, 09:03 PM
Post #3


Expert
****


Group: Members
Posts: 765
Joined: 2-November 06
Member No.: 31,390
Location: Virginia
Drives: 1999 Eclipse RS
Status: OFFLINE



If you get a cold air then watch out for puddles, you wouldn't want water being sucked up and F****** up your engine now, would you?
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
jonbonazza
post Jun 6 2008, 09:30 PM
Post #4


1.8 God
*****


Group: Members
Posts: 1,682
Joined: 28-April 05
Member No.: 9,294
Location: Fairmont, WV
Drives: '93 Eclipse 1.8, '03 Dodge Neon SXT
Status: OFFLINE



QUOTE(NoirRacer @ Jun 6 2008, 10:03 PM)
If you get a cold air then watch out for puddles, you wouldn't want water being sucked up and F****** up your engine now, would you?
*



they make bypass valves for that purpose.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile CardEmail Poster
QuoteReply
justnobody123
post Jun 6 2008, 10:20 PM
Post #5


Member
*


Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 21-May 08
Member No.: 58,104
Location: harrison, nj
Drives: 95 Talon TSI AWD
Status: OFFLINE



well, none of them are worth wasting much money on. HP wise its not much difference, cold air intakes are more expensive then you waste another 50bucks for the bypass valve. Not worth it, get the short ram and be worry free with puddles.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
jonbonazza
post Jun 6 2008, 10:34 PM
Post #6


1.8 God
*****


Group: Members
Posts: 1,682
Joined: 28-April 05
Member No.: 9,294
Location: Fairmont, WV
Drives: '93 Eclipse 1.8, '03 Dodge Neon SXT
Status: OFFLINE



QUOTE(justnobody123 @ Jun 6 2008, 11:20 PM)
well, none of them are worth wasting much money on. HP wise its not much difference, cold air intakes are more expensive then you waste another 50bucks for the bypass valve. Not worth it, get the short ram and be worry free with puddles.
*



actually unless u have a ram air hood CAIs net far greater hp gains than a short ram. colder air yeilds greater combuster which in turn yeilds more power. a regular short ram is just taking hot air in unless u have a hood scoop.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile CardEmail Poster
QuoteReply
fullmoon
post Jun 6 2008, 10:52 PM
Post #7


Expert
****


Group: Members
Posts: 957
Joined: 23-July 05
Member No.: 12,867
Location: Los Angeles, California
Drives: 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Status: OFFLINE



I think thr term "Ram Air" is just advertising hype. Ya wanna see ram air drive down the road with your hand out the window, Now does that feel like 5lbs of boost? If it does then go ahead hook the so-called Ram Air" down through the front of your hood down to that drivers hole in the front of ya fender after ya remove the clips and face it into the wind so you can "Ram' all the air the system that baby can handle...Now go find a stock GST and race em and check back with me.... :)

I think the correct name is "Cool Air Intake System" or "Under Hood Intake System" should be th correct name.

The Cool air that many compnays sell (And thei is not to diss em but to make em live up to what they are really advertising) should be sold in such a way as to have true separation of intake air and underhood temps as in a inlet tube and heat sheilding on the intire length of the tube and the filter installed on the outside of the car and yes it could e built to "Ram" the air but that in it's self would only serve as to keep the temp constant the in fact "The Ramming of air from the outside through a tube has no lbs. per. sq. in. effect on any engine" Period! ;)
Top
User is offlinePMProfile CardEmail Poster
QuoteReply
jonbonazza
post Jun 6 2008, 11:04 PM
Post #8


1.8 God
*****


Group: Members
Posts: 1,682
Joined: 28-April 05
Member No.: 9,294
Location: Fairmont, WV
Drives: '93 Eclipse 1.8, '03 Dodge Neon SXT
Status: OFFLINE



QUOTE(fullmoon @ Jun 6 2008, 11:52 PM)
I think thr term "Ram Air" is just advertising hype. Ya wanna see ram air drive down the road with your hand out the window, Now does that feel like 5lbs of boost? If it does then go ahead hook the so-called Ram Air" down through the front of your hood down to that drivers hole in the front of ya fender after ya remove the clips and face it into the wind so you can "Ram' all the air the system that baby can handle...Now go find a stock GST and race em and check back with me.... :)

I think the correct name is "Cool Air Intake System" or "Under Hood Intake System" should be th correct name.

The Cool air that many compnays sell (And thei is not to diss em but to make em live up to what they are really advertising) should be sold in such a way as to have true separation of intake air and underhood temps as in a inlet tube and heat sheilding on the intire length of the tube and the filter installed on the outside of the car and yes it could e built to "Ram" the air but that in it's self would only serve as to keep the temp constant the in fact "The Ramming of air from the outside through a tube has no lbs. per. sq. in. effect on any engine" Period! ;)
*



I think you are misunderstanding the concept. ram air means the air is being forced into the engine bay due to the scoop in the hood. after entering the hood it goes directly into the filter of a short ram intake giving ur engine more air at once and cooler air at that. now a cold air intake is completely different. it is positioned lower to the ground where air temperatures are much cooler (cold are falls, plus its not getting the heat coming from the engine). If you have a hood with a hood scoop the short ram will net much better gains (of course when I say much better I mean like 10bhp total IF that.) also you cant compare a car with a CAI with a turboed car. CAIs are meant for Naturally aspirated cars. of course a turbo is gonna be faster CAI's were built for N/A cars to give them a lil extra pep.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile CardEmail Poster
QuoteReply
NoirRacer
post Jun 7 2008, 01:40 AM
Post #9


Expert
****


Group: Members
Posts: 765
Joined: 2-November 06
Member No.: 31,390
Location: Virginia
Drives: 1999 Eclipse RS
Status: OFFLINE



You will not gain much power from a intake at all. Not only an intake, almost any bolt ons with a non turbo will net very little. I have a short ram intake and it sounds cool, if I even get ONE extra hp out of it then great. A CAI would have gotten me 2-3hp for $150 more, not including a bypass valve.

Also, the cold air really doesn't get cold air, it just sits lower, ok maybe a little cooler but still. And there's no way you're going to "ram" but so much air into your engine. Not only that but to keep up with that air you'd be using more fuel or be running lean, that is if it actually "rammed" an accountable amount of air into the engine.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
dannwo1
post Jun 18 2008, 06:41 PM
Post #10


Full Member
**


Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 18-June 08
Member No.: 59,744
Location: N.E. Pennsylvania
Drives: 1998 Eclipse GS
Status: OFFLINE



Either way you decide to go remember it's all pipes. AEM 200$ OBX 20$ PCV plumbing from home depot 5$ its the same stuff. Save your money.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
greenydsm
post Jun 20 2008, 10:43 PM
Post #11


Expert
****


Group: Members
Posts: 1,197
Joined: 15-January 07
Member No.: 34,124
Location: usa
Drives: 1997 eclipse gs 88 camaro
Status: OFFLINE



ebay piping with a good filter


works everytime.


but for you 420a guys.. get a piece of rubber hose insulation. cut it in half(half moon shape) and put that over your battery hold down.. MINE rubbed a hole though my short ram.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile CardEmail Poster
QuoteReply
bueshy
post Jun 21 2008, 04:03 PM
Post #12


Senior
***


Group: Members
Posts: 338
Joined: 2-February 07
Member No.: 34,945
Location: Houston
Drives: 1999 Eclipse GS(soon turbo)
Status: OFFLINE



QUOTE(lillben07 @ Jun 5 2008, 05:15 PM)
Which would be better for getting the biggest power boost on a 91 Eclispe GS with the 4G63 (2.0L)?
*




neither... a turbo. bolt ons are fun for the first 2 mins that you feel a performance increase. but after that you just want more. so save your money


that's my .02 :beer:
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
  Advanced Search
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
Get your Mitsubishi listed in the Garage Today, for FREE, to share with the world what you drive and what toys and modifications you have.
 
> Link To Us
If you found our site useful please link to us <a href="http://www.mitsubishi-forums.com">Mitsubishi-Forums.com</a>.
 
 
Time is now: 7th October 2008 - 07:12 AM
Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.