|
Found this snippet on testing procedures involved in getting your estimated mileage. It's no surprise they differ considerably, as no one on earth drives a vehicle like they test them. At best you can glean relative differences between vehicles. I don't know what the process is south of 49, but I hope it is more realistic.
Testing procedures for vehicle fuel consumption New vehicles are "run in" for about 6000 km before testing. Vehicles are mounted on a programmable two-wheel laboratory chassis dynamometer and, using two-wheel drive, are run through simulated city and highway driving cycles. This carefully controlled method of testing, including the use of standardized fuels, laboratories and testing equipment, is used instead of on-road driving to ensure that all vehicles are tested under identical conditions.
Fuel consumption ratings are generated based on test cycles and correction factors that take into account the aerodynamic efficiency, weight, rolling resistance, drive mode of different vehicles and average real-world driving conditions in Canada. Other adjustments are made to reflect the average fuel consumption of vehicle configurations, options and sales mixes sold in Canada.
All vehicles, including four-wheel (4×4) and all-wheel drive (AWD), are tested in two-wheel drive (2WD) mode.
Simulated city course City fuel consumption ratings are based on a 22-minute simulated drive of 12 km, with 16 complete stops. The average speed of the test is 32 km/h.
Simulated highway course Highway fuel consumption ratings are based on a 12-minute simulated highway course of 16 km with no stops. The top speed during the test is 96.5 km/h, and the average speed of the test is 77 km/h, reflecting an urban-highway driving environment.
|