Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · Resend Validation Email
Mitsubishi-Forums.com > General > Other Cars > Holy S#!t
     
                        
Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.
2 Pages < 1 2 
 Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Feature my ride Newest rides Updated rides Most modified

Do you like Mitsubishi-Forums.com? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!
 Holy S#!t, 05' WRX STI
 
red97gst
post Feb 1 2006, 11:37 AM
Post #21


Senior
***


Group: Members
Posts: 362
Joined: 12-August 05
Member No.: 13,976
Location: Spokane, WA
Drives: 1997 Mitsu Ecipse GS-T
Status: OFFLINE



QUOTE(utiheadbanger @ Jan 31 2006, 11:07 AM)
Only if it's mid- or rear-engine...

And I don't agree that AWD is for whimps.  I'd like to see you use RWD on a rally course!  :beer:
*




lol i'd like to see a stealth on a rally course! :P
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
TTAngel
post Feb 1 2006, 01:31 PM
Post #22


Wing Nut
****


Group: Members
Posts: 935
Joined: 16-June 05
Member No.: 10,897
Location: Green Bay, WI
Drives: 1995 Dodge Stealth RT/TT
Status: OFFLINE



QUOTE(red97gst @ Feb 1 2006, 11:37 AM)
lol i'd like to see a stealth on a rally course!  :P
*



you asked for it... :laughing:

http://www.davewolin.com/3000gt.htm

(IMG:http://www.davewolin.com/images/3000gt.jpg)

3000gt, but same guts as a stealth... and yes, they do come stock with wheel gap that bad...

:blink:
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
utiheadbanger
post Feb 1 2006, 03:17 PM
Post #23


Nissan Tech
*****


Group: Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1,984
Joined: 18-July 05
Member No.: 12,629
Location: Bartlett, IL
Drives: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer ES
Status: OFFLINE



Dude that's awesome. I guess the added weight does help in keeping it from being airborne. :P

Top
User is offlinePMProfile CardEmail Poster
QuoteReply
Tolchock
post Jul 19 2007, 04:26 PM
Post #24


Newbie



Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 19-July 07
Member No.: 42,412
Location: UK
Drives: Mitsubishi Evo 4
Status: OFFLINE



Stay away from fwd unless you want to be wheel spinning for 10 minutes at the lights. Rwd for having fun maybe doing a few drifts, Awd for pure grip and road holding.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
chi-towngst
post Jul 20 2007, 06:03 PM
Post #25


Newbie



Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 17-June 07
Member No.: 41,003
Location: USA
Drives: 1997 mitsubishi eclipse gst----06 nisan murano sl awd.
Status: OFFLINE



AWD cars ae good 4 quarter miles runs. meaning short runs only..my friend evo 9 MR. leaves me for like 3 in the take off and we go like that all the way. he cant leave me more. but in the highway( meaning rolling start) take me by a fender only.But an STI over a EVO???NO WAY...STI maight have 10 xtra Horses but that car look to bulky like offroad use only...not city friendly at all... :beer:
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
EMC 3000gt
post Jul 22 2007, 10:54 AM
Post #26


Cougar Hunter
Group Icon

Group Icon
Group: Super Mod
Posts: 5,313
Joined: 18-October 06
Member No.: 30,873
Location: Tri-State Area
Drives: 1992 3000 GT TT, 2007 Scion TC
Status: OFFLINE



1st the neons have crap cv joints andf are notorios for snapping...

sencond the sti vs evo thing will go on and on and on. the evo has a smaller motor plus bigger turbo so its lag bam as with the sti bigger motor smaller turbo. its basically a very linear bamish from the start thats all i have on that. and im not sure about the turbo size but I know for a fact bout the motors.

My vote is for the STI though... sorry boys and girls.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
silvreclipse
post Jul 22 2007, 11:26 AM
Post #27


Veteran
*****


Group: Members
Posts: 1,599
Joined: 10-April 07
Member No.: 38,147
Location: usa houston tx
Drives: 07 dodge charger 99 eclipse rs dohc (5 speeder)
Status: OFFLINE



QUOTE(EMC 3000gt @ Jul 22 2007, 10:54 AM)

My vote is for the STI though... sorry boys and girls.
*




sti are just butt ugly.mitsu evo all the way.
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
xeberus
post Nov 21 2007, 04:18 PM
Post #28


Member
*


Group: Members
Posts: 70
Joined: 21-February 07
Member No.: 35,915
Location: USA
Drives: 1999 Eclipse 2.0l non-turbo
Status: OFFLINE



Yea they're fast but they look like crap imo. There are to many ways to get 300hp and look good making it to even mess around with an sti
Top
User is offlinePMProfile Card
QuoteReply
  Advanced Search
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

2 Pages < 1 2
 Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
Get your Mitsubishi listed in the Garage Today, for FREE, to share with the world what you drive and what toys and modifications you have.
 
> Link To Us
If you found our site useful please link to us <a href="http://www.mitsubishi-forums.com">Mitsubishi-Forums.com</a>.
Collapse> Similar Threads
Topic Title Author Views Replies Last Post
Holy ****
Forum : 1G/2G (1990-1999) Eclipse		 ncskates 120 3 Apr 25 2008, 11:30 PM
By: Rob
Holy Hell
Forum : 1G/2G (1990-1999) Eclipse		 Slim 2.4 189 12 Dec 29 2007, 06:10 PM
By: Slim 2.4
Holy Turbo!
Forum : 3G (2000-2005) Eclipse		 marine_0n3 305 4 Dec 5 2007, 10:12 PM
By: EMC 3000gt
Holy Almost Fireball
Forum : 1G/2G (1990-1999) Eclipse		 hardcore_4x4 200 4 Feb 7 2007, 11:07 PM
By: 92hp92eclipse
Holy Crap...i Can't Chane A Tire!?
Forum : 3000GT & GTO Forum		 cherb 468 3 Dec 2 2006, 11:45 AM
By: expositor
 
 
Time is now: 5th July 2008 - 05:50 PM
(c) 2004 Mitsubishi-Forums. All rights reserved.
Mitsubishi-Forums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.